Maria Bruno
In Search Of The Female Character:
Teaching Screenwriting At The Millennium


Every year I teach a course in screenwriting at a major Midwestern university. Most
of my students are male Tarantino clones who write scripts that could star Robert DeNiro
or Harvey Keitel. There's always a bank heist, an Uzi, and second tier gangsters who grunt
in Brooklynese. Everyone says the f-word an awful lot, and they smoke stogies, drink
tequila, and play a mean five car stud. There's lots of gunfire, testicular explosions, and
male banter about Nintendo, Aerosmith, and perverse bodily functions.
The women characters appear as molls, whores, bimbos or heroin addicts. Every
now and then there's a kindly large hipped woman who shows up dispensing wisdom and
comfort food, much like Martin Scorcese's own mother who acted in his films portraying
the mother of an array of dysfunctional gangsters. For the most part, my students' female
characters are invisible, and if they speak, they speak in hushes or whispers then disappear
at any sign of real action. The female characters are most often auxiliaries to the real
meaningful action. And even though I caution my students that females are 51% of the
population and deserve to be represented in films in positive ways and not just as props or
scenery, (I even have a lecture entitled Thelma and Louise. Hello?) they still submit scripts
that are male driven and derivative. Most have that classic Tarantino scene with six men
wearing black suits who amble down the street in wide angle, smoking unfiltered Camels,
talking about heists and hookers with hearts of gold. One is, ironically, always named Mr.
Pink.
I wanted my students to become writers, to get in touch with their inner voices, to
create characters that are believable and that the audience can attach to in a meaningful way.
Whenever I give opening lectures on "Creativity " or "Getting in Touch With Your Inner
Voice," I find my male students oddly resistant, as if this was something that might betray
their avowed masculinity. To them my request was somehow aligned with the occult, the
province of witches and unsuccessful female screenwriters who pen annoying "Chick
Flicks."
I feel a certain responsibility to all my potential screenwriting students since one of
my former students actually did make it reasonably big in the movies, crafting a cult classic
that included blood dripping from light bulbs, a woman clad only in a thong bikini
murdered in a bathroom, and several buckets of pea green vomit.
In
The Artist's Way: A Spiritual Guide to Higher Creativity, Julia Cameron writes "When I teach screenwriting, I remind my students that their movie already exists in its entirety. Their job is to listen for it, watch it with their mind's eye, and write it down." Writers need to learn to trust that it will come. And they need to listen deeply,
beyond the predictable, the stereotypical, and the easy. They need to trust that there is
something beyond a resolution in gunfire, that there is adventure and real life (read: plot) in
other places besides Guido's Diner in Far Rockaway, Queens. They need to learn that
females can be heroes, have courage, say meaningful things without the benefit of a
wonder bra, mini skirt, and five inch heels, even if the latest Emma Peel from
The
Avengers
can collar a criminal wearing crotch tight leather pants and black stiletto boots
worthy of a dominatrix.
I knew I had to do something because year after year the scripts became more and
more predictable: a car crash, a drug deal gone bad , and a Nicholas Cage look-alike, all
buff and predatory, running from a fiery explosion, his wild hair flying, his automatic
weapon slung on his shoulder like a third appendage. Someone named Lola, fresh from
breast augmentation surgery, waits for him in a smoky dark sublet "somewhere in the
bowels of Queens."
And then the media, with Hollywood at the forefront, was forced to take some
responsibility for the Columbine massacre and all the high school shoot-outs that preceded
it. I felt a very real obligation to my students to say enough is enough, and force them to
create character driven scripts that are about more than bullets, mayhem and corpses.
Martin Scorcese comments in a
Premiere (Oct. 1999) interview that "...there is
something else going on out there with younger people, and I think it's something at the
very core of our materialistic society. The more gadgets you get, the more you get
separated from what's really human inside of you" (76-7). In the same interview director
Spike Lee argues "I still think that filmmakers have to be responsible. They have to know
that a film still has a very powerful impact, and you can't mess with that" (76).
For these very reasons, I worked all summer creating a course that would help
them explore their inner selves as writers . It would be difficult, I knew, because this was
the generation nurtured on MTV, Sega, sitcoms, and sound bites. We now live in a world
of late night Jerry Springer, where unfaithful men sit stage center between two warring
women with bad perms who pummel each other with fists and trailer park epithets. The
men are usually unappealing, often toothless, and speak in monosyllables punctuated with
language that even the Springer producers have to censure in a succession of staccato
beeps. This is the same world where male rappers sing about slapping women upside the
head, and where aging MTV rockers, pumped up with pheromones and Viagra, incite
bikini clad women to spontaneously gyrate like pole dancers at a New Orleans skin club.
It's also a world where third graders bring guns to school, where high schoolers can find
instructions on how to build a bomb right off the internet, where it's easier to buy an
automatic weapon than it is to buy cigarettes. With each impending CNN story, it's no
wonder people, and my students in particular, feel disconnected, and are overwhelmed by
the weight of all this technology.
I began the year with rhythms. I brought drums and tambourines to class and gave
them freewriting assignments while I pranced about the room beating a rhythm. Their only
instructions were to write very fast, on hyperspeed, while I accompanied their creative fury
with a beat, a rattle, a primordial tap. They resisted at first, not trusting me completely, half
thinking, I suppose, that I was a late sixties hippie in mourning for Jerry Garcia, an errant
Gypsy run amuck, someone in dire need of a post tenure review. But I persisted, high
stepping down the aisles, urging them on. And when they read their works later in class,
you could see that for those few moments they had tapped into something, something
deeper than a South Park slapstick about flatulence, vomit, or bowel maladies. There was
that look of recognition that teachers rarely see, the giant CLICK, the aha. They got to a
place that pre-dated technology, automatic weapons, the remote control. The class gave a
collective sigh.
Later we graduated to Mozart and Beethoven, and like a pregnant mother holding
her belly up to the stereo speakers, hoping to improve her future child's mathematical
abilities, I doggedly played classical music at the beginning of every hour, having them
again write to the rhythms, to go into a trancelike state where automatic writing is the norm.
Again, I met some resistance; I could tell they wanted to write to something more
contemporary, something where Marilyn Manson sings about pentagrams and suicide, or
where someone named Ice or Puffy raps about "bitches" and "ho's" and bad cops. It took
weeks for their pencils to glide across the blank paper as if they were channeling from a
higher source, forgetting the dark dirges and malaise that inhabited their Walkmans, which
they plugged into their ears as soon as class was over.
I knew that journal keeping, a must for any writer, would also meet resistance,
guessing my male students might believe journals or diaries were the province of pre-
adolescents who secretly wrote mushy verse about Leonardo DiCaprio or The Backstreet
Boys. So I passed out three by five cards to each student, and told them to keep them in
their pockets. No matter where they were or what they were doing, I wanted them to write
down whatever came to them. An idea. An image. A line of dialogue.
The women students handed in notebooks, finding the cards too small for their
expansive writing where they often dotted their "i's" with huge circles, reminiscent of giant
moons. The male students handed in very little at first, or printed cryptic monosyllabic
notes written too small to decipher without my reading glasses. Gradually, the males
opened up, got beyond their initial resistance, and began to write. I often read the cards
anonymously aloud to the class, like a series of "found poems", and this served expand our
experiences even further. "The white dove leaps from the railing, the spirit of my dead
grandmother..." I read aloud to the class.
"No Walkmans!" I shouted on our walking "Sensory" tour through the university's
Horticultural Gardens. We were there to explore our five senses, savoring the oregano and
licorice plants, collecting petals, rocks, and pine cones, watching grackles dive at wild
berries. The three-by-five cards emerged; students scribbled furiously as we traipsed
through the bougainvillea and the honeysuckle. Of course, I wanted them to hear the hum
of the universe, something that may or may not happen on a forced march through nature,
led by a drum toting pedagogue hell bent on improving the status of film for the
millennium. I could live without the buzz and rattle of a cosmic connection. And they
certainly could live without me supplying them with a faux mantra, as I led them on a path
of my choosing. But if they could connect, even briefly, to that inner child who at one
point in their lives felt everything intensely, reacted to smells, tastes, to touches in ways
that we can hardly remember, they may be able to find that original voice they were born
with, and like the white dove, leap to a new place.
Most important, they worked in groups for the entire class. This is nothing
revolutionary in the teaching of writing, of course, but it is essential for all writers at any
stage of their careers. A writing group can be a writer's lifeline---a source of constant
evolving inspiration, a place where there is trust.
I wish I could say everyone wrote a
Citizen Kane or a Schindler's List, but
of course, that wasn't the case. I had several heist movies; teenagers who at various stages
of stress turned into werewolves, vampires, and vegan Goths. And thanks to HBO's The
Sopranos, several scripts featured burly Italians ordering hits on hyperspeed-- like Joe
Pesci on amphetimines. Actually the vegan Goth script showed promise and was about an
anti-dissection rally staged during a fetal pig lecture in advanced biology at Warren G.
Harding High School by three Honors Society girls bound for the Ivy League. It was a
workable script with great politics until the girls turned out to be aliens sporting lizard
tongues who resolved everything with intergalactic warfare. I frankly was inconsolable
when they lost their scholarships to Harvard, Princeton, and Yale respectively. "Can only
alien females ever get perfect SAT's?' I argued in a personal writing conference, to no
avail, still loving the original premise that three females can wage heroic battle against the
powers that be, even if they wore all black and pierced their navels and blew up
cheerleading practice with laser technology.
But I was full of praise for the three female characters who, for awhile, were heroes, spoke meaningful dialogue, and lit up the screen, literally, with an otherworldliness that transcended Mr. Pink and his homeboys all suited up and packing heat somewhere in New Jersey. And that alone made my semester a great success.
 

Copyright © 2000 Maria Bruno
All Rights Reserved

contents